From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu May 16 03:24:48 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id DAA15514
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 16 May 1996 03:24:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id DAA15508
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 16 May 1996 03:24:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id DAA08475; Thu, 16 May 1996 03:23:00 -0700 (PDT)
To: Mark Mayo <mark@quickweb.com>
cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: BSDI binary support 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 16 May 1996 00:14:03 EDT."
             <Pine.BSF.3.91.960516001115.26905B-100000@scooter.quickweb.com> 
Date: Thu, 16 May 1996 03:23:00 -0700
Message-ID: <8473.832242180@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> How compatible is FreeBSD (2.1R) with BSDI binaries? The reason I ask is 

For 1.1 binaries, very.

> that I run the BSDI versions of the Netscape Proxy server with no 
> problems, but I just tried setting up the BSDI 2.1 binaries for the 
> Microsoft FrontPage server extensions (for web authoring..) and all of 
> their binaries just core dump on me.. what's the reason for this?

It's not compatible with 2.x binaries.  That support was added later
on in 2.2-current (haven't checked yet to see if it was brought into
2.1-stable, but if so that would be your best bet).

					Jordan