Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 19:03:00 +0600 From: Osinnyy Bogdan <kaldownb@gmail.com> To: <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org> Subject: difference img \ iso Message-ID: <DUB406-EAS420543E01D6EEAEB7E4C508CDBD0@phx.gbl>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi there. I just want to try some freebsd and get stunned by choosing what release I should to download\install. So I ask you: what difference between iso\img, I mean, If I download dvd1.iso and mount it on USB drive => starting installation, what difference between this method and by using *.img ? Why am I asking, 'cause dvd1's got 3 times more weight, but I never faced with .img when installing windows systems. Thanks.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?DUB406-EAS420543E01D6EEAEB7E4C508CDBD0>