From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 21 16:48:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8ABB1065670; Mon, 21 May 2012 16:48:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [94.124.105.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CCBE8FC17; Mon, 21 May 2012 16:48:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A0A828427; Mon, 21 May 2012 18:40:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (static-84-242-120-26.net.upcbroadband.cz [84.242.120.26]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D0E9728426; Mon, 21 May 2012 18:40:12 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4FBA6FEB.1000706@quip.cz> Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 18:40:11 +0200 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 Lightning/1.0b1 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jason Hellenthal References: <4FBA618A.1050707@freebsd.org> <20120521155736.GA79323@DataIX.net> In-Reply-To: <20120521155736.GA79323@DataIX.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Michael Scheidell , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PHP 5.4.0 : lang/php54 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 16:48:18 -0000 Jason Hellenthal wrote: > > > On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:38:50AM -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote: >> >> >> On 5/21/12 11:36 AM, Chris Rees wrote: >>> When would have been a better time? >>> >> after it was regression tested? >> after the security posture (susosin patch) wasn't downgraded? > > after a announcement in ports/UPDATING saying it will become the default > no later than ...XX...XX...XX days "be prepared!" I think that the best will be to not have any default "php5" port and just use php52, php53, php54, php5X, php60... as we have apache20, apache22, apache24, or mysql50-server, mysql51-server, mysql55-server. There is no default apache2 or mysql5-server, so there is no confusion what is / what will be installed. Then it can be choosed in make.conf what version will be used as default, similar to WITH_MYSQL_VER=51 or APACHE_PORT=www/apache22 Miroslav Lachman