Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:26:49 -0400 From: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Replacing rc(8) (Was: FreeBSD Boot Times) Message-ID: <4FE1CF99.1070108@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20120620073920.GA5300@lonesome.com> References: <4FDF6177.5050608@unsane.co.uk> <4FDF6586.9060501@gentoo.org> <4FDFB166.2040709@FreeBSD.org> <4FDFB44D.9090308@gentoo.org> <4FE0ADCD.9010109@FreeBSD.org> <4FE0C123.8030301@gentoo.org> <CAGH67wRidMZrzjzTSdwud%2BZ5V--wOTN8CHXOWcOr%2BE5XHYo2rA@mail.gmail.com> <4FE0F773.1080403@gentoo.org> <CAGH67wQdb-c0Kf=60rkaJSH8Hd0OjwCi=rQQMzGq8xfp2q7b=Q@mail.gmail.com> <4FE100F9.2050009@funtoo.org> <20120620073920.GA5300@lonesome.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 06/20/2012 03:39 AM, Mark Linimon wrote: > fwiw, from previous discussions on FreeBSD boot time, ISTR that there > are other places where more time is spent. Some analysis to prove that > indeed the rc subsystem is the dominant term would be a good starting > place. I neither claimed that it was dominant nor should that be a prerequisite for improvements to be made. The start time of FreeBSD jails in particular would benefit most from RC improvements.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FE1CF99.1070108>