From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Dec  9 17:20:14 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D90E16A4CE
	for <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org>; Thu,  9 Dec 2004 17:20:14 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from outbound0.sv.meer.net (outbound0.sv.meer.net [205.217.152.13])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E53543D49
	for <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org>; Thu,  9 Dec 2004 17:20:14 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from gnn@neville-neil.com)
Received: from mail.meer.net (mail.meer.net [209.157.152.14])
	iB9HKAwR097993;	Thu, 9 Dec 2004 09:20:13 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from gnn@neville-neil.com)
Received: from minion.local.neville-neil.com (h229.neville-neil.com
	[209.157.133.229] (may be forged))
	by mail.meer.net (8.12.10/8.12.10/meer) with ESMTP id iB9HK18r082107;
	Thu, 9 Dec 2004 09:20:02 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from gnn@neville-neil.com)
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 09:19:58 -0800
Message-ID: <m2vfbbtmm9.wl@minion.local.neville-neil.com>
From: gnn@FreeBSD.org
To: JINMEI Tatuya / =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCP0BMQEMjOkgbKEI=?=
	<jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp>
In-Reply-To: <y7vllc7hn0g.wl@ocean.jinmei.org>
References: <20041115222310.GA93130@scylla.towardex.com>
	<41B1EB4E.78490459@freebsd.org>
	<20041206114646.GD999@squash.dsto.defence.gov.au>
	<y7vllc7hn0g.wl@ocean.jinmei.org>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.10.1 (Watching The Wheels) SEMI/1.14.5 (Awara-Onsen)
	FLIM/1.14.5 (Demachiyanagi) APEL/10.5 Emacs/21.2 (powerpc-apple-darwin)
	MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.5 - "Awara-Onsen")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Initial review request for IPv6 Fast Forwarding and IP6STEALTH
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 17:20:14 -0000

At Thu, 09 Dec 2004 17:52:15 +0900,
jinmei wrote:
> (Perhaps this is slightly an off-topic for this list, but) I'm also
> interested in the reason, but it's not surprising that someone in the
> world has a negative impression on a big feature like IPv6 or IPsec,
> since such a thing has typically both pros and cons.

I'd really hope that this thread does not "devolve" around this issue,
and perhaps Andre could answer this privately, as it really is off topic.

> So, I hope core FreeBSD developers to care about the quality of IPv6
> implementation as seriously as that of IPv4 implementation, regardless
> of their own position on IPv6 itself.  As an IPv6-related person, I'm
> willing to help that process if I can do something in that area.

And as a new committer who's mostly working on IPv6 I can tell
you that there are those of us who are working to make sure that the
IPv6 in FreeBSD remains top notch.

Later,
George