From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 18 19:29:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1906216A4CE for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 19:29:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ylpvm15.prodigy.net (ylpvm15-ext.prodigy.net [207.115.57.46]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF10B43D6B for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 19:29:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-67-115-74-195.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.115.74.195]) i7IJT8EU007403; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:29:08 -0400 Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A250651824; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 12:29:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 12:29:05 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: drhodus@machdep.com Message-ID: <20040818192905.GA44432@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200408160104.03708.chris@behanna.org> <20040818185154.GA41476@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040818190924.GA43377@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: chris@behanna.org cc: chat@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: Public Access to Perforce? X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 19:29:08 -0000 --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 03:23:04PM -0400, David Rhodus wrote: > On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 12:09:24 -0700, Kris Kennaway w= rote: > >=20 > > Hey, it was your silly argument to begin with. >=20 > No, I was just following up on someone else's post that wanted the > perforce development work to be available for public download because > I think that it should too and that anything else would just not be > the correct thing for fbsd to do. Crescent Anchor is a commercial > company, not an open source project, though there are several > employees that work there which develop on open source projects as > their full time job. So you'd be happy if we changed the name of the FreeBSD perforce repo to - say - LibreBSD, and charged people for access? This would bring it in line with the DragonFly/FireFly model. Of course, this would clearly be a step backwards from the situation as it exists now with FreeBSD, which again points out how silly (dare I say hypocritical) your argument is. Kris --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBI64BWry0BWjoQKURAi4OAKCaHfnF2j1Xg6ZjkLGC38aUMNmqBACgxNrs gw8yyHs3RLjRhk/Qy2gJlu8= =5qSl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY--