From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 15 08:56:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C659E16A4CE; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 08:56:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from saturn.criticalmagic.com (saturn.criticalmagic.com [68.213.16.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91B9943D1D; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 08:56:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from richardcoleman@mindspring.com) Received: from mindspring.com (titan.criticalmagic.com [68.213.16.23]) by saturn.criticalmagic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E668F3BD2A; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 11:56:04 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <402FA4B3.3020405@mindspring.com> Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 11:56:19 -0500 From: Richard Coleman Organization: Critical Magic, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Will Andrews References: <200402142352.i1ENqx8b059528@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040215013237.GA21554@sirius.firepipe.net> <20040215014059.GD19592@saboteur.dek.spc.org> <20040215015306.GB21554@sirius.firepipe.net> In-Reply-To: <20040215015306.GB21554@sirius.firepipe.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel Makefile ports/devel/p4v Makefiledistinfo.i386 pkg-descr pkg-message pkg-plist.i386 X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: richardcoleman@mindspring.com List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 16:56:05 -0000 Will Andrews wrote: > On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 01:40:59AM +0000, Bruce M Simpson wrote: > >>It is a completely new version with no files in common. A repocopy wouldn't >>have bought us anything. > > > Aside from the fact that the same piece of software used to be in > the tree as a Linux version? > > IMHO you should have at least asked for one, as the ports > committers guide recommends. I'm confused. Why would you want a repo copy when there is no relevent history to maintain? (since the history is for another program). And the Linux client might come back one day, so it would continue from the files that were killed. Richard Coleman richardcoleman@mindspring.com