From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Oct 19 6:50:52 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from fac13.ds.psu.edu (fac13.ds.psu.edu [146.186.61.98]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E273237B403 for ; Fri, 19 Oct 2001 06:50:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fac13 (localhost.ds.psu.edu [127.0.0.1]) by fac13.ds.psu.edu (8.11.6/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f9JDoXG91805; Fri, 19 Oct 2001 09:50:33 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from hawk@fac13.ds.psu.edu) Message-Id: <200110191350.f9JDoXG91805@fac13.ds.psu.edu> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3.1 01/18/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: "Tomek" , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: I got hacked, I think In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 18 Oct 2001 14:23:36 MDT." <03db01c15812$c4575d40$f6f073d1@mpionline.com> From: dochawk@psu.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 09:50:33 -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG tomek told, > I take it that "sh" would not even request a login or anything if called > directly from inetd.conf, would it? I am sitting here, he is STILL > pinging me and watching the system (even tried to ftp again a few > minutes ago), In that case, why haven't you a) phoned the police, and b) notified his provider so that they can both catch him in the act??? hawk -- What part of "non-negotiable" didn't you understand? /"\ ASCII ribbon campaign dochawk@psu.edu Smeal 178 (814) 375-4700 \ / against HTML mail These opinions will not be those of X and postings. Penn State until it pays my retainer. / \ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message