From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Sep 27 12:18:12 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62395E021B1 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 12:18:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from se@freebsd.org) Received: from mailout04.t-online.de (mailout04.t-online.de [194.25.134.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mailout00.t-online.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25BAB7046C for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 12:18:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from se@freebsd.org) Received: from fwd32.aul.t-online.de (fwd32.aul.t-online.de [172.20.26.144]) by mailout04.t-online.de (Postfix) with SMTP id 541334180C82 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 14:18:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Stefans-MBP-2.fritz.box (Z6KOvQZQohRh+anCS0tFm63twzCc685Qz9-pIDAQS1hu+VIW9KmQ5GzjEvQd8-1gVG@[84.154.105.197]) by fwd32.t-online.de with (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) esmtp id 1dxBHp-0BEFpg0; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 14:17:57 +0200 Subject: Re: [HEADUP] FLAVORS landing. To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <91d1252c-5398-dca8-f337-959fa722efc7@freebsd.org> From: Stefan Esser Message-ID: <5f2632cd-4c7c-c1e3-d4f9-292c5cfe90a1@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 14:17:56 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <91d1252c-5398-dca8-f337-959fa722efc7@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-ID: Z6KOvQZQohRh+anCS0tFm63twzCc685Qz9-pIDAQS1hu+VIW9KmQ5GzjEvQd8-1gVG X-TOI-MSGID: ba51a3e1-35b0-4268-8a41-909bba9a633a X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 12:18:12 -0000 Am 27.09.17 um 13:52 schrieb Julian Elischer: > On 27/9/17 4:20 pm, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > Before this gets too far down the road I would like to suggest that we > quickly formalise some nomenclature > or we will have 200 different ideas as to how to do the same thing; > > I would like to propose the following possible "examples of official" > flavours: > -nodocs         ..  nearly every port has a DOCS option..  a way to > automatically turn it off globally and generate said pkgs would be good. > -minimal ..  smallest possible feature set.. probably used just to > satisfy some stupid dependency. > -kitchensink    ..  speaks for itself .. options lit up like a christmas > tree > -runtime        ..  no .a files, include files, development > documentation or sources .. >                     might only contain a single libxx.so.N file, or a > single binary executable. No, these are no good examples for flavours, as I understand them ... These are possible typical sub-package categories, or rather you could remove the DOCS from the base port, but offer a sub-package for them. I'd rather think that NO-X11 might become a typical flavour, or the dependency on a particular crypto library (e.g. openssl vs. libressl). Regards, STefan