From owner-freebsd-security Wed Jul 31 12:50:28 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACF2337B400 for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 12:50:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from net2.dinoex.sub.org (net2.dinoex.de [212.184.201.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EBB743E65 for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 12:50:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org) Received: from net2.dinoex.sub.org (dinoex@net2.dinoex.sub.org [127.0.0.1]) by net2.dinoex.sub.org (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g6VJoA5H006579 for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 21:50:11 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org) X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: Received: from gate.dinoex.sub.org (dinoex@localhost) by net2.dinoex.sub.org (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) with BSMTP id g6VJoAUh006561 for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 21:50:10 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org) To: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Message-ID: From: dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org (Dirk Meyer) Organization: privat Subject: Re: Are OpenSSL bugs related to OpenSSH ? Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 21:43:34 +0200 X-Mailer: Dinoex 1.79 References: <1028113366.1406.0.camel@linux> <200207311127.g6VBRWY98818@www.wsf.at> <20020731151607.GD26793@madman.nectar.cc> X-Gateway: ZCONNECT gate.dinoex.sub.org [UNIX/Connect 0.94] X-PGP-Fingerprint: 44 16 EC 0A D3 3A 4F 28 8A 8A 47 93 F1 CF 2F 12 X-Copyright: (C) Copyright 2001 by Dirk Meyer -- All rights reserved. X-PGP-Key-Avail: mailto:pgp-public-keys@keys.de.pgp.net Subject:GET 0x331CDA5D X-ZC-VIA: 20020731000000S+2@dinoex.sub.org X-Accept-Language: de,en X-Noad: Please don't send me ad's by mail. I'm bored by this type of mail. X-Note: sending SPAM is a violation of both german and US law and will at least trigger a complaint at your provider's postmaster. X-No-Archive: yes Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Jacques A. Vidrine wrote: > I think the configure script is broken, and having the port library > version number artificially higher is not a great idea. :-( It is not fully configures fault, as I found now way to tell ld to link with the desired libssl.so it the nubers are equal. As the port version is newer or equal the version in the base, linking with libssl.so from the ports is desired. So if no port is installed everything compiles and links with the base version, and when the port is installed each port can link against it. The version BUMP makes this clear, even if the API is the same. Otherwise we have to hack about 200 ports to select. kind regards Dirk - Dirk Meyer, Im Grund 4, 34317 Habichtswald, Germany - [dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org],[dirk.meyer@guug.de],[dinoex@FreeBSD.org] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message