Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 04:46:48 +0000 From: John Birrell <jb@what-creek.com> To: Jim Thompson <jim@netgate.com> Cc: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, Andrew Atrens <atrens@nortel.com>, current@freebsd.org, small@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD's embedded agenda Message-ID: <20060530044648.GA60110@what-creek.com> In-Reply-To: <B6E2C38F-191F-436B-A4F9-E2061C44C386@netgate.com> References: <HCEPKPMCAJLDGJIBCLGHKEHMFGAA.james@wgold.demon.co.uk> <447B6870.8020704@nortel.com> <20060530040220.GA59831@what-creek.com> <B6E2C38F-191F-436B-A4F9-E2061C44C386@netgate.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 06:42:14PM -1000, Jim Thompson wrote: > Everything you wrote is true, if (and only if) your application can > deal with having the non-vm-based filesystem(s) be RO. Try it with what is in FreeBSD now. Just do it. It really does work. -- John Birrell
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060530044648.GA60110>