From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 19 16:08:00 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B40F106564A for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 16:08:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from k@kevinkevin.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C1FD8FC14 for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 16:08:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iyb26 with SMTP id 26so4617035iyb.13 for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 08:07:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.239.72 with SMTP id kv8mr2490281icb.183.1298131679677; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 08:07:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from kkPC (not.enough.unixsluts.com [76.10.166.187]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gy41sm2975255ibb.11.2011.02.19.08.07.57 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 19 Feb 2011 08:07:58 -0800 (PST) From: "kevin" To: "'Nikos Vassiliadis'" References: <000c01cbcf94$35e76e20$a1b64a60$@com> <4D5FAC16.7080207@gmx.com> <00a201cbd03f$2bdc3540$83949fc0$@com> <4D5FD91F.20704@gmx.com> <4D5FDCF1.6050909@gmx.com> In-Reply-To: <4D5FDCF1.6050909@gmx.com> Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 11:07:39 -0500 Message-ID: <00a501cbd04f$2276b5b0$67642110$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Content-Language: en-us Thread-Index: AcvQRwcQCc0Osi5IRpyx/fvaKZ0MCQAB+Jpg Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Bridging + VLANS + RSTP / MSTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 16:08:00 -0000 >No, you have to specify stp there. The default STP mode is RSTP. >If you don't specify stp, you'll get a dumb ethernet bridge. Thanks very much for clarification. This helps me immensely. My room for testing is limited so this will help me take the right steps necessary. One quick last question : would you recommend pfsync in this scenario, between bridges? I've been hearing a lot of issues with pfsync but I'm not sure what behavior to expect in a bridging scenario such as this one.