From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 20 17:05:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DCE016A41F for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 17:05:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21F6143D45 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 17:05:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C9815EEF; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 12:05:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 48354-07; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 12:05:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from [199.103.21.238] (pan.codefab.com [199.103.21.238]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3CBC5D67; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 12:05:28 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <43D104EA.8040400@writeme.com> References: <43D104EA.8040400@writeme.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <6F9BE890-80EE-4EB1-9033-4D269C61A0AD@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Charles Swiger Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 12:05:27 -0500 To: AlanBAKA X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Speed up ports compiling under SMP (muti cpu) ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 17:05:30 -0000 On Jan 20, 2006, at 10:42 AM, AlanBAKA wrote: > I know how to use make -j x to compiling src > but I have try to use for compiling ports but doesn't work. > any way I can use all my cpu to compiling ports? There are 13,000 ports which would require testing and fixing of their Makefiles to be safely parallizeable. While you can help by fixing the ports you actually use, I would not rely on parallel builds to always work... -- -Chuck