From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun May  7 11:01:36 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id LAA26522
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 7 May 1995 11:01:36 -0700
Received: from ref.tfs.com (ref.tfs.com [140.145.254.251])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id LAA26516
          for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 7 May 1995 11:01:35 -0700
Received: (from phk@localhost) by ref.tfs.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) id LAA10362; Sun, 7 May 1995 11:01:31 -0700
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@ref.tfs.com>
Message-Id: <199505071801.LAA10362@ref.tfs.com>
Subject: Re: Bug of if_ze is serious! (Re: Help! if_ze bug?)
To: hosokawa@mt.cs.keio.ac.jp (HOSOKAWA Tatsumi)
Date: Sun, 7 May 1995 11:01:30 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, hosokawa@mt.cs.keio.ac.jp
In-Reply-To: <199505071741.CAA03062@remington.mt.cs.keio.ac.jp> from "HOSOKAWA Tatsumi" at May 8, 95 02:41:27 am
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 722       
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> My card comes to work fine now.  But I can't explain why it works.
> 
> When I configured the ze with
> 
>   device ze0 at isa? port 0x320 net irq 5 iomem 0xd0000 flags 0x10 
> 	vector zeintr
> 
> the sending packet corrupts, but configured it
> 
>   device ze0 at isa? port 0x320 net irq 5 iomem 0xd4000 flags 0x10 
> 	vector zeintr
> 
> it works fine...  Hmm....
> 
> The former ioaddr is default value.  Why it does not work on the
> former configuration?
Well, do you have any other cards in the machine ?

What is flags 0x10 anyway ?

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@login.dknet.dk> -- TRW Financial Systems, Inc.
'All relevant people are pertinent' && 'All rude people are impertinent'
=> 'no rude people are relevant'