From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 11 15:15:56 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB04637B401 for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 15:15:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lakemtao04.cox.net (lakemtao04.cox.net [68.1.17.241]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D84C43FB1 for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 15:15:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eqe@cox.net) Received: from osiris.darkronin.com ([68.110.210.240]) by lakemtao04.cox.netESMTP <20030811221556.RCGU13930.lakemtao04.cox.net@osiris.darkronin.com> for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 18:15:56 -0400 From: Eriq Lamar Organization: darkronin.com To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 18:16:26 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200308111816.26818.eqe@cox.net> Subject: smp in 5.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 22:15:57 -0000 Is there any advantage in 5.1 over 4.8 for two amd mp's. and if so could someone tell what they are. I am interested in building dual system using mp's but not sure which version would be better.