From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 15:16:44 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F63316A405 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:16:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from yertle.kcilink.com (thingy.kcilink.com [74.92.149.59]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BE3913C45B for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:16:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from host-121.int.kcilink.com (host-121.int.kcilink.com [192.168.7.121]) by yertle.kcilink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70FD18A0B6 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:16:43 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <32DF7439-5B15-4212-BE92-36F80A7A2224@khera.org> From: Vivek Khera To: FreeBSD Stable List In-Reply-To: <4594886.5961203490569242.JavaMail.root@ly.sdf.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:16:43 -0500 References: <4594886.5961203490569242.JavaMail.root@ly.sdf.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.919.2) Subject: Re: Dual Core Xeon / i386 install w/ more than 4gb of RAM X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:16:44 -0000 On Feb 20, 2008, at 1:56 AM, Tom Samplonius wrote: > And is there some really stability fear about FreeBSD on x86-64? > Seems just the same as i386. Some poorly written software fails to run properly in 64-bit environment. I have one such package, and my solution was to compile it on a 32-bit box, and copy the binaries over. Works just fine with 32-bit compat enabled on the amd64 kernel. Other than that, the FreeBSD/amd64 has been 100% rock solid for me since 6.0 when I started getting 64-bit boxes.