From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 4 10:50:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3224B16A4CE for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 10:50:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-64-165-226-221.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.165.226.221]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E190C43D3F for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 10:50:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A884A66D39; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 10:50:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 10:50:35 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: "Vladimir B. Grebenschikov" Message-ID: <20040204185035.GB26210@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <1075883492.76993.65.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <1075893137.779.43.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3uo+9/B/ebqu+fSQ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1075893137.779.43.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: "current@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: HEADS UP: MAJOR changes to the ports system X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 18:50:40 -0000 --3uo+9/B/ebqu+fSQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 02:12:29PM +0300, Vladimir B. Grebenschikov wrote: > ? ??, 04.02.2004, ? 11:31, Joe Marcus Clarke ?????: > > On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 03:22, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > >=20 > > > > Sorry for the wide distribution, but it is critical that -CURRENT u= sers > > > > hear this. Two _MAJOR_ changes just went in to the ports tree that= are > > > > bound to cause some pain to -CURRENT users. =20 > > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > I'm glad to hear about this and I wouldn't mind hearing regularly abo= ut > > > major events over in the ports tree. > >=20 > > I've started doing this. The full summary was sent to ports@ and > > ports-developers@, plus I added a copy to /usr/ports/CHANGES. This is > > now the second major ports update I've summarized. Once the archives > > get back up to speed, you should be able to see my previous summary. >=20 > How about gettext -> gettext-old transition ? A lot of ports still=20 > depends on gettext-old while others on gettext, gettext conflicts with=20 > gettext-old, and, as result, portupgrade -af constatntly tries to > install gettext-old as dependancy and fails. Not any more...you're out of date :-) Kris --3uo+9/B/ebqu+fSQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAIT76Wry0BWjoQKURAlzSAJoCI/r1Cnu7xr+HSnF7cJ4elKp0tQCgxWan RE7uWbdX4NV+cRj6gaC6b5o= =bIk+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3uo+9/B/ebqu+fSQ--