From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 14 10:48:05 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B67237B401 for ; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 10:48:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kientzle.com (h-66-166-149-50.SNVACAID.covad.net [66.166.149.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89E5D43FB1 for ; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 10:48:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kientzle@acm.org) Received: from acm.org (ugly.x.kientzle.com [66.166.149.53]) by kientzle.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h6EHm1gY028472; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 10:48:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kientzle@acm.org) Message-ID: <3F12ED7B.9020700@acm.org> Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 10:50:51 -0700 From: Tim Kientzle User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021005 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Garance A Drosihn , freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Error building /rescue on -current X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: kientzle@acm.org List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 17:48:05 -0000 Garance A Drosihn wrote: > Has anyone mentioned problems in buildworld in the building > of the new /rescue directory? Yes, they have. > make: don't know how to make > /usr/obj/usr/src/rescue/rescue//usr/src/sbin/dhclient/client/clparse.o. > Stop > *** Error code 2 > I am building with -j5 on a dual-processor i386 system, if > that's significant. So far, every report of this problem has had these two elements in common: * parallel builds * dhclient/client/clparse.o I've tried tracing through the crunchgen-generated Makefile for /rescue (/usr/obj/usr/src/rescue/rescue/rescue.mk) and the dhclient makefile (/usr/src/sbin/dhclient/Makefile) and have yet to come up with anything. (To be honest, I haven't even managed to reproduce this problem.) Both of these makefiles are pretty peculiar, and I had the devil of a time getting it to work correctly for serial builds, so I shouldn't be surprised that it's causing problems. Maybe someone who understands parallel make better than I do could suggest something to look for? Tim Kientzle