From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 14 11:38:26 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE4FE37B401 for ; Thu, 14 Aug 2003 11:38:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net (sccrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.202.55]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEAC243F93 for ; Thu, 14 Aug 2003 11:38:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@zero.nolaf.net) Received: from zero.nolaf.net (nolaf.net[68.82.90.123]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with ESMTP id <2003081418382401100q2ghqe>; Thu, 14 Aug 2003 18:38:24 +0000 Received: by zero.nolaf.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 56439388; Thu, 14 Aug 2003 14:38:24 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 14:38:24 -0400 From: Michael McDowell To: security@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030814183824.GA29697@nolaf.net> Mail-Followup-To: security@freebsd.org References: <20030811133749.U27196@fubar.adept.org> <20030811232132.GB46629@madman.celabo.org> <20030811162602.N72549@fubar.adept.org> <20030812085617.GA407@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030812085617.GA407@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-GPG-Fingerprint: 8CA7 DF3C 5CE5 180D DC59 0A1A 06D2 7D87 285A 6470 X-GPG-Key: http://www.nolaf.net/public_key.txt Subject: Re: realpath(3) et al X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting] List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 18:38:27 -0000 I agree with the OpenBSD suggestion, it would be a real time saver. On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 10:56:18AM +0200, Simon L. Nielsen wrote: > On 2003.08.11 16:34:40 -0700, Mike Hoskins wrote: > > > Wasn't there a page (maybe there still is...) showing sections of the base > > system as 'assigned' to certain individuals, with contact info listed? I > > think it was pretty stale for awhile, but maybe something similar could be > > revived and maintained. If it already is, great! > > There is http://www.freebsd.org/auditors.html but it hasn't been updated for > a very long time. > > BTW, if anybody really wants to start up the audit project again, I > think somebody should take a look at integrating some of the changes > OpenBSD has made. No reason to spend time finding the bugs OpenBSD has > already fixed. > > -- > Simon L. Nielsen > FreeBSD Documentation Team