From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Sep 7 17:55:35 1995 Return-Path: questions-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id RAA15127 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 7 Sep 1995 17:55:35 -0700 Received: from vespucci.iquest.com (root@vespucci.iquest.com [199.170.120.42]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id RAA15121 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 1995 17:55:31 -0700 Received: from [204.177.193.231] (n4hhe.iquest.com [204.177.193.231]) by vespucci.iquest.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id TAA17906 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 1995 19:55:25 -0500 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 7 Sep 1995 19:55:37 -0600 To: questions@freefall.freebsd.org From: dkelly@iquest.com (David Kelly) Subject: Re: current Sender: questions-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Chuck Robey said: > To get from there to current, you get the current sources using either > ctm or sup, then you go into single user and make world. Duh. Silly me should have thought of that "single user" business. Meanwhile when I built a 2.1-STABLE I did it multi-user. Was pretty amazed that it worked and replaced all my 2.0.5R binaries in the process. And didn't get caught in any loop. And its been humming right along for 8 days now... I was real pleased with myself too, until now. The Question: am I hosed? _Should_ I re-make world from single user or just wait for 2.1R? -- David Kelly N4HHE, n4hhe@amsat.org, dkelly@iquest.com ============================================================= The human mind ordinarily operates at only ten percent of its capacity -- the rest is overhead for the operating system.