From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 15 22:31:08 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96DB216A4F6; Sat, 15 Jan 2005 22:31:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ss.eunet.cz (ss.eunet.cz [193.85.228.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBF8C43D46; Sat, 15 Jan 2005 22:31:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mime@traveller.cz) Received: from localhost.i.cz (ss.eunet.cz. [193.85.228.13]) by ss.eunet.cz (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j0FMVNV7041924; Sat, 15 Jan 2005 23:31:23 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mime@traveller.cz) From: Michal Mertl To: Poul-Henning Kamp In-Reply-To: <12216.1105825982@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <12216.1105825982@critter.freebsd.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 23:31:03 +0100 Message-Id: <1105828263.8572.17.camel@genius2.i.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit cc: pjd@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: crashdump support in geom_mirror X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 22:31:08 -0000 Poul-Henning Kamp píše v so 15. 01. 2005 v 22:53 +0100: > In message <1105825795.8572.3.camel@genius2.i.cz>, Michal Mertl writes: > >Hello, > > > >is anyone working on kernel crash dump support for geom_mirror? How > >difficult is it going to be? I'm willing to invest some time doing the > >implementation but I don't know where to start. It seems to me it will > >be very different than normal crash dumps in controller drivers. > > It is impossible at present and unlikely to ever materialize. GEOM > requires context-switches to work. > Ok, thank you. Other than that - I'd like to say - "Good work, PHK a PJD for GEOM and the mirror class". I don't consider this shortcoming really important anyway. Until PJD started writing his classes I hadn't realized the benefits of GEOM. Have you noticed someone just uses gmirror with ggate in production? Idea which, as I understand it, even PJD didn't have when writing the classes. Simple yet efficient way to set-up the disks for high-availability cluster. I don't know if it is possible but with some more layers of gate and fox you could probably implement even high-available SAN. Michal