From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 3 12:33:00 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E94C16A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 12:33:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sarajevo.pacific.net.sg (sarajevo.pacific.net.sg [203.120.90.134]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4E55143D2F for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 12:32:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oceanare@pacific.net.sg) Received: (qmail 15637 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2005 12:32:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO maxwell2.pacific.net.sg) (203.120.90.192) by sarajevo with SMTP; 3 Apr 2005 12:32:57 -0000 Received: from [192.168.0.107] ([210.24.247.53]) by maxwell2.pacific.net.sg with ESMTP id <20050403123256.NKR1191.maxwell2.pacific.net.sg@[192.168.0.107]>; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 20:32:56 +0800 Message-ID: <424FE26F.9050501@pacific.net.sg> Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 20:32:47 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky Organization: oceanare pte ltd User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050224) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Holger Kipp References: <3aaaa3a0503271958205ca8e1@mail.gmail.com> <20050403014218.GA57319@intserv.int1.b.intern> In-Reply-To: <20050403014218.GA57319@intserv.int1.b.intern> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Chris cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd naming of releases X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 12:33:00 -0000 Hi, Holger Kipp wrote: > On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 04:58:21AM +0100, Chris wrote: > > We had this type of discussion already several times. Search the > archive for corresponding posts. This discussion is pointless and > only wastes bandwith. > It looks like that it was not accepted by somebody that ... > The real problem is that people do not read and/or think. people do not read and do not think. Nearly all other software I know uses the naming schema of alpha, beta and gamma respective final. Why should people start thinking and reading if all could be included in a single word? > A different naming scheme won't change that. > Yes, I agree. But why do you want to achieve the impossible? Erich