From owner-freebsd-security Fri Sep 17 15: 3:53 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from lariat.lariat.org (lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE93A14DDD for ; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 15:03:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: from mustang (IDENT:ppp0.lariat.org@lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by lariat.lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA15282; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 16:03:20 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.19990917160133.0483e1c0@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 16:03:16 -0600 To: Warner Losh From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: BPF on in 3.3-RC GENERIC kernel Cc: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group , Darren Reed , Harry_M_Leitzell@cmu.edu, security@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199909171939.NAA04615@harmony.village.org> References: <4.2.0.58.19990916100439.048ebd70@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 01:39 PM 9/17/99 -0600, Warner Losh wrote: >The best solution would be to have the IP stack that could deal with >the needs of dhcp. Technically, DHCP really should be in its OWN stack (though it will be sending commands to control and enable the IP stack). It ought to plug in like IPX and Appletalk do. This would be a really nice, clean solution. --Brett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message