From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 2 17:31:36 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1206318C for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 17:31:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rush.bluerosetech.com (rush.bluerosetech.com [IPv6:2607:fc50:1000:9b00::25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDE6716DF for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 17:31:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from chombo.houseloki.net (unknown [IPv6:2601:7:1680:365:21c:c0ff:fe7f:96ee]) by rush.bluerosetech.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A8AE811437; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 09:31:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from [IPv6:2601:7:1680:365:6c84:41a:bb99:ad5e] (unknown [IPv6:2601:7:1680:365:6c84:41a:bb99:ad5e]) by chombo.houseloki.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 740A4376; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 09:31:33 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <529CC3EA.4030202@bluerosetech.com> Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 09:31:22 -0800 From: Darren Pilgrim User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ilya Bakulin Subject: Re: unbound-control in FreeBSD-CURRENT and stable/10 References: <20131129142143.GA29437@olymp.kibab.com> <20131129142729.GA29580@olymp.kibab.com> <5298EA83.30705@bluerosetech.com> <7507eb85a259cbb96c232625bb883460@mail.bakulin.de> In-Reply-To: <7507eb85a259cbb96c232625bb883460@mail.bakulin.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 17:31:36 -0000 On 12/2/2013 4:56 AM, Ilya Bakulin wrote: > On 2013-11-29 20:26, Darren Pilgrim wrote: >> On 11/29/2013 6:27 AM, Ilya Bakulin wrote: >> >> There's really no bug to fix. The base has unbound in it, >> unbound-control is part of unbound. If you install unbound from >> ports, you should delete unbound from base. I haven't tried out 10.x >> yet, but you usually just set a knob like WITHOUT_UNBOUND in >> /etc/src.conf, then do: > > Why on earth I should rebuild the whole system just to get rid of > Unbound? Who said anything about running the buildworld target? Just do what my original email said: 1. Add the appropriate knob to /etc/src.conf 2. make delete-old delete-old-libs