Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 20:52:38 +0200 From: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> To: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Cc: freebsd-fs <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>, Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: 11-STABLE vs 11.0-RELENG test Message-ID: <d2e6b5d1-3ccd-7aaf-b106-a7e7d97fcb69@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAJjvXiE3aaG-Eb1Q_3RQ3zony0jUqoVDzEkrD6AC%2BJ_r9VVc0g@mail.gmail.com> References: <8b4ba98d-03d3-f671-33b2-ed12d3b4fb7c@FreeBSD.org> <374b6d16-5cb4-9338-ec1d-65ad93ca29dc@FreeBSD.org> <CAJjvXiE3aaG-Eb1Q_3RQ3zony0jUqoVDzEkrD6AC%2BJ_r9VVc0g@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 06.03.2017 20:11, Matthew Ahrens wrote: > FYI - I am changing this sorting to be based on the bookmark (objset, > object, level, blkid) instead of timestamp. This normally doesn't > change the performance on illumos, but it should fix this on FreeBSD > (and it ensures that the multi-threaded spa_sync doesn't degrade > performance). > > Here's the PR; you can pick out the "sort by bookmark" commit if you want: > > https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/138 Thank you for the notice, but we already have alike patch in a tree for few months to address the mentioned issue: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=309714 We'll just replace one patch with another when yours comes in to reduce the code divergence. -- Alexander Motin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?d2e6b5d1-3ccd-7aaf-b106-a7e7d97fcb69>