From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Dec 4 22:56:39 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F19694AEBB5 for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 22:56:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kiri@truefc.org) Received: from kx.truefc.org (1.212.52.36.ap.yournet.ne.jp [36.52.212.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp", Issuer "smtp" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Cnp3p5Vw0z3vb3 for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 22:56:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kiri@truefc.org) Received: from kx.truefc.org (kx.truefc.org [36.52.212.1]) by kx.truefc.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0B4MuSYt004497; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 07:56:28 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from kiri@kx.truefc.org) Message-Id: <202012042256.0B4MuSYt004497@kx.truefc.org> Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2020 07:56:28 +0900 From: KIRIYAMA Kazuhiko To: Steve Kargl Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=llvm=90 ignored? In-Reply-To: <20201204203507.GA8573@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20201204203507.GA8573@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Goj=F2?=) APEL/10.8 MULE XEmacs/21.4 (patch 24) (Standard C) (amd64--freebsd) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Cnp3p5Vw0z3vb3 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kiri@truefc.org has no SPF policy when checking 36.52.212.1) smtp.mailfrom=kiri@truefc.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.90 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[36.52.212.1:from]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[kiri]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[truefc.org]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[36.52.212.1:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:10013, ipnet:36.52.208.0/21, country:JP]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports]; ONCE_RECEIVED(0.10)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2020 22:56:40 -0000 On Sat, 05 Dec 2020 05:35:07 +0900, Steve Kargl wrote: > > It takes a long time to compile on my laptop. I have > > DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=llvm=90 > > in my /etc/make.conf. I go to update gnuplot and get > > % portmaster -Byd gnuplot > ... > Install devel/llvm10 > ... > Install devel/llvm90 > > Does it really take two versions of llvm to compile > gnuplot and dependencies? Is something broken in > the ports *.mk files? In recent ports (at least r555444) many ports need deferent llvm versions, so it would be no wonder. It's strange that many ports could not built because llvm* headers can't refer. Such ports are devel/qt5-qmake, devel/xxhash, dns/bind916, graphics/frei0r, graphics/opencv, graphics/openjpeg , ... --- Kazuhiko Kiriyama