From owner-freebsd-doc Tue Mar 23 10:17:17 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from pcslink.com (pcslink.com [206.43.160.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D39FD14C09 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 1999 10:17:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ryan@pcslink.com) Received: (from ryan@localhost) by pcslink.com (8.8.7/8.6.12) id LAA05779 for freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG; Tue, 23 Mar 1999 11:16:45 -0700 (MST) From: Ryan Mooney Message-Id: <199903231816.LAA05779@pcslink.com> Subject: Small suggestion. To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 11:16:45 -0700 (MST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL31H (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On the ports page I think it might be better if the "search for a port" box was up near the top of the page. I've noticed that a number of people I pointed there seemed to have a problem scrolling down far enough to see it, and its sort of hidden in the text. Sticking it at the top wouldn't be that big a jump.... Also I thought it incongrous that the ports changes search under the "search" page is quite a bit better than the one under the ports page, as I can select which ports tree I want among other tuning knobs. Perhaps making the search under the "ports" page simular to or the same as the one under the changes page would make life a lot easier. Since the ports are such a big selling point, making them as easy to find as possible helps a lot. If you think I'm all wet on this, let me know... But this was just my thought. >-=-=-=-=-=-=-<>-=-=-=-=-=-<>-=-=-=-=-=-<>-=-=-=-=-=-<>-=-=-=-=-=-=-< Ryan Mooney Phone (602)265-9188 PCSLink ryan@pcslink.com Internet Services NT is an excellent choice for managers who need to show that they used up their fiscal year budget for hardware/software expenditures. <-=-=-=-=-=-=-><-=-=-=-=-=-><-=-=-=-=-=-><-=-=-=-=-=-><-=-=-=-=-=-=-> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message