From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 2 20:55:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EE4216A41F for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2005 20:55:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (transport.cksoft.de [62.111.66.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5DD943D45 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2005 20:55:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE4731FF9AF; Tue, 2 Aug 2005 22:55:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id 455421FF9A8; Tue, 2 Aug 2005 22:55:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix, from userid 1060) id E778F1560B; Tue, 2 Aug 2005 20:51:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD62915380; Tue, 2 Aug 2005 20:51:55 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 20:51:55 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net To: VANHULLEBUS Yvan In-Reply-To: <20050802183007.GA13203@zeninc.net> Message-ID: References: <42EFAEBE.8060905@seton.org> <20050802183007.GA13203@zeninc.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS cksoft-s20020300-20031204bz on transport.cksoft.de Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RE: NAT-T support for IPSec stack X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 20:55:10 -0000 On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote: Hi, > > Yes ( as a user ) but I am not a FreeBSD developer. I think there was > > initially resistance from open source groups to integrate this support > > due to patent issues ( maybe just WRT usage w/ IKEv1 ) but must have > > been resolved as both OpenBSD and Linux support this functionality now. > > Yep. > > KAME team did not integrate another NAT-T implementation a few years > ago for those reasons. > > More infos about that may be get from Emmanuel Dreyfus, a NetBSD > developper and a member of the ipsec-tools team, which made the NetBSD > NAT-T support, and told me a few month ago that NetBSD lawyers were > looking at that potential IPR issue. do you have more info about this? -- Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT