Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 20:51:55 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: VANHULLEBUS Yvan <vanhu_bsd@zeninc.net> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RE: NAT-T support for IPSec stack Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.53.0508022049220.27151@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <20050802183007.GA13203@zeninc.net> References: <42EFAEBE.8060905@seton.org> <20050802183007.GA13203@zeninc.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote: Hi, > > Yes ( as a user ) but I am not a FreeBSD developer. I think there was > > initially resistance from open source groups to integrate this support > > due to patent issues ( maybe just WRT usage w/ IKEv1 ) but must have > > been resolved as both OpenBSD and Linux support this functionality now. > > Yep. > > KAME team did not integrate another NAT-T implementation a few years > ago for those reasons. > > More infos about that may be get from Emmanuel Dreyfus, a NetBSD > developper and a member of the ipsec-tools team, which made the NetBSD > NAT-T support, and told me a few month ago that NetBSD lawyers were > looking at that potential IPR issue. do you have more info about this? -- Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.53.0508022049220.27151>