From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 29 15:00:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C38016A4D5 for ; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 15:00:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5C3443D69 for ; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 15:00:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i1TN0Zbv039174 for ; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 15:00:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i1TN0ZaX039173; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 15:00:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Resent-Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 15:00:35 -0800 (PST) Resent-Message-Id: <200402292300.i1TN0ZaX039173@freefall.freebsd.org> Resent-From: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org (GNATS Filer) Resent-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Resent-Reply-To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, Alex Rousskov Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ED9216A4CF for ; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 14:52:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from measurement-factory.com (measurement-factory.com [206.168.0.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CADAC43D2D for ; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 14:52:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rousskov@measurement-factory.com) Received: from measurement-factory.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i1TMqvBq067187 for ; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 15:52:57 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from rousskov@measurement-factory.com) Received: (from rousskov@localhost) by measurement-factory.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id i1TMqvZj067186; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 15:52:57 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from rousskov) Message-Id: <200402292252.i1TMqvZj067186@measurement-factory.com> Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 15:52:57 -0700 (MST) From: Alex Rousskov To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.113 Subject: ports/63555: Port survey: Zero fetchable files when no locations checked X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Alex Rousskov List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 23:00:42 -0000 >Number: 63555 >Category: ports >Synopsis: Port survey: Zero fetchable files when no locations checked >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-ports-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Sun Feb 29 15:00:35 PST 2004 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Alex Rousskov >Release: FreeBSD 4.9-PRERELEASE i386 >Organization: The Measurement Factory >Environment: System: FreeBSD measurement-factory.com 4.9-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 4.9-PRERELEASE #1: Tue Sep 16 12:30:45 MDT 2003 wessels@measurement-factory.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/TMF i386 >Description: I have received an automated email from Bill Fenner saying that the port I maintain (devel/hapy) is unfetchable. The e-mail suggests that I fix the problem and file a PR. The port survey URL[1] indicates that all locations for Hapy distribution were skipped and have never been checked. I have verified that Hapy distribution fetches fine using the ports system. I am unsure how to clear the error flag in port survey, and it looks like there are many ports in similar "all skipped and never checked" state. Could someone please let me know how the error flag that generates automated emails from Bill Fenner can be cleared in this situation? Thank you, Alex. P.S. It looks like survey software should distinguish "NEVER checked" from "checked some and all failed" cases, to avoid sending warnings to maintainers of ports that have not been checked yet. Or is there a problem with the port that prevents it from being checked? [1] http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/portsurvey/rousskov@measurement-factory.com.html >How-To-Repeat: Search for "0 OK, 0 bad, 5 skipped" on the survey page: http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/portsurvey/devel.html >Fix: n/a >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: