From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 14 13:36:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4661A16A420 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 13:36:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anderson@centtech.com) Received: from mh1.centtech.com (moat3.centtech.com [207.200.51.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E803543DB1 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 13:35:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from anderson@centtech.com) Received: from [10.177.171.220] (neutrino.centtech.com [10.177.171.220]) by mh1.centtech.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k2EDZfEH071445; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 07:35:41 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from anderson@centtech.com) Message-ID: <4416C6AA.5050200@centtech.com> Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 07:35:38 -0600 From: Eric Anderson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060112) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Tancsa References: <4415E8BB.1080602@centtech.com> <6.2.3.4.0.20060313172933.1058dc30@64.7.153.2> In-Reply-To: <6.2.3.4.0.20060313172933.1058dc30@64.7.153.2> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/1329/Mon Mar 13 18:22:03 2006 on mh1.centtech.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: panic: ffs_valloc: dup alloc X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 13:36:51 -0000 Mike Tancsa wrote: > At 04:48 PM 13/03/2006, Eric Anderson wrote: >> I get the above panic after nfs clients attach to this nfs server and >> being >> I do have dumps from two crashes so far. >> This is FreeBSD-6.1-PRERELEASE from Friday-ish. > > Dont know if it was fixed or not, but there were a lot of VM changes > committed last night that might help. > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2006-March/023526.html I just updated, and it still happens. More information for those interested: mode = 0100600, inum = 58456203, fs = /mnt panic: ffs_valloc: dup alloc #0 doadump () at pcpu.h:165 165 __asm __volatile("movl %%fs:0,%0" : "=r" (td)); (kgdb) backtrace #0 doadump () at pcpu.h:165 #1 0xc064482f in boot (howto=260) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:399 #2 0xc0644b55 in panic (fmt=0xc0890967 "ffs_valloc: dup alloc") at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:555 #3 0xc077ee3c in ffs_valloc (pvp=0xc8eab440, mode=33152, cred=0xc8a91d80, vpp=0xe83a5824) at /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_alloc.c:945 #4 0xc07a5933 in ufs_makeinode (mode=33152, dvp=0xc8eab440, vpp=0xe83a5acc, cnp=0xe83a5ae0) at /usr/src/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_vnops.c:2165 #5 0xc07a2b0d in ufs_create (ap=0x0) at /usr/src/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_vnops.c:171 #6 0xc082dc98 in VOP_CREATE_APV (vop=0x0, a=0xe83a5a18) at vnode_if.c:204 #7 0xc0737590 in nfsrv_create (nfsd=0xc8a91d00, slp=0xc8816700, td=0xc7d99780, mrq=0xe83a5c98) at vnode_if.h:111 #8 0xc0744e95 in nfssvc_nfsd (td=0x0) at /usr/src/sys/nfsserver/nfs_syscalls.c:472 #9 0xc0744688 in nfssvc (td=0xc7d99780, uap=0xe83a5d04) at /usr/src/sys/nfsserver/nfs_syscalls.c:181 #10 0xc081cd7f in syscall (frame= {tf_fs = 59, tf_es = 59, tf_ds = 59, tf_edi = 1, tf_esi = 0, tf_ebp = -1077941448, tf_isp = -398828188, tf_ebx = 4, tf_edx = 672385208, tf_ecx = 25, tf_eax = 155, tf_trapno = 12, tf_err = 2, tf_eip = 671840155, tf_cs = 51, tf_eflags = 662, tf_esp = -1077941476, tf_ss = 59}) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:981 #11 0xc0809e8f in Xint0x80_syscall () at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/exception.s:200 #12 0x00000033 in ?? () Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?) (kgdb) Maybe that helps somebody? Should I sent this to -current instead, since it appears this would happen under -current also, and possibly there is a larger base of people watching the list? Thanks! Eric -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric Anderson Sr. Systems Administrator Centaur Technology Anything that works is better than anything that doesn't. ------------------------------------------------------------------------