From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 17 14:44:26 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED4F9712 for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 14:44:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeff.t@mail.com) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [74.208.4.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7408A4E for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 14:44:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailout-us.mail.com ([172.19.198.49]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmxus001) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0Mexa9-1UVV9h1oAj-00OZA6 for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 15:44:20 +0100 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2013 14:44:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO blazon-pc.rw.local) [78.84.97.244] by mail.gmx.com (mp-us009) with SMTP; 17 Feb 2013 09:44:19 -0500 X-Authenticated: #76218138 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19hwKhPvsFhTEAq9ZW/3P/vyVdnoUDyfc9zR/4ZMl dTT5SmMn8Sjlff Message-ID: <5120ECE6.7090602@mail.com> Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 16:44:54 +0200 From: Jeff Tipton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121030 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports & Packages [Stable] in sync References: <511FAC10.9060806@mail.com> <4D08169B-0CA9-4BF0-BD22-0E6674D0894F@my.gd> In-Reply-To: <4D08169B-0CA9-4BF0-BD22-0E6674D0894F@my.gd> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 14:44:27 -0000 On 02/17/2013 13:13, Damien Fleuriot wrote: > On 16 Feb 2013, at 16:56, Jeff Tipton wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I upgraded 9.0 -> 9.1 on my netbook and only then found out that there are no packages for 9.1-RELEASE. On my desktops, I keep ports and packages at the RELEASE versions, so I only have to compile when I need non-default options or when there are no packages. Would it be possible to get the ports snapshot that was used to compile the 9-STABLE packages? I think I could use subversion but then I need to know the revision number of that snapshot. What do you suggest? >> >> Thanks, >> Jeff >> > Hi Jeff, > > I think you might be confused here. > > It is my understanding that there are ports for: > - HEAD > - x.y-RELEASE > > I don't think you're going to be able to get a snapshot from 9-STABLE, because -STABLE is a continuing work. > > What version do you consider to be 9-STABLE ? > Every time there's a new commit you get a "new" 9-STABLE. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Thank you, Damien, for the reply. AFAIK, STABLE gets updated every 2 weeks but not every day, and it seems to be that because of the intrusion, it has not been updated for long. The versions of the ports that come with the 9.1-RELEASE are even slightly newer than those of 9-STABLE packages. I think if I don't get the revision number from which the 9-STABLE was updated last time I'll use the ports tree that comes with 9.1-RELEASE. I hope it won't cause much version incompatibilities.