From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 16 22:13:07 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F66FBCE; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 22:13:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.madpilot.net (grunt.madpilot.net [78.47.145.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BED3FF0A; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 22:13:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail (mail [192.168.254.3]) by mail.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3l5X1w6MP8zbHN; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 23:12:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.madpilot.net ([192.168.254.3]) by mail (mail.madpilot.net [192.168.254.3]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wak_NxePCwup; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 23:12:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from tommy.madpilot.net (micro.madpilot.net [88.149.173.206]) by mail.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 23:12:44 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5507555C.7030508@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 23:12:44 +0100 From: Guido Falsi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeremie Le Hen Subject: Re: net/unison240 depends on lang/ocaml-nox11 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 22:13:07 -0000 On 03/16/15 22:37, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: > Actually, I've just realized that I fixed net/unison232 in my local tree :o). > > Would you mind submitting it and applying the same for unison240? > I never noticed this since it never happened to me and nobody else reported it. Anyway now that you draw my attention, yes, it needs fixing. Your patch looks correct, but please allow me a little time for some testing. Thanks for bringing this up! >> [00:00:58] ====>> Error: Duplicated origin for ocaml-nox11-4.01.0_4: >> lang/ocaml-nox11 AND lang/ocaml. Rerun with -vv to see which ports are >> depending on these. Just to be sure I get it right, is this error reported at the start of the run while "Calculating ports order and dependencies"? -- Guido Falsi