From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 21 06:09:40 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65D9C145 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 06:09:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtprelay03.ispgateway.de (smtprelay03.ispgateway.de [80.67.18.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26E09766 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 06:09:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [89.182.173.25] (helo=localhost) by smtprelay03.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1XgSdW-00033Z-1Y for freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 08:09:38 +0200 Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 08:09:37 +0200 From: Marcus von Appen To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Convert your bugs from Needs MFC Message-ID: <20141021060937.GB1065@medusa.sysfault.org> Reply-To: Marcus von Appen MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="q1jWcapaUnvKIiHl" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Df-Sender: MTEyNTc0Mg== X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 06:09:40 -0000 --q1jWcapaUnvKIiHl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Dear freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org, the "Needs MFC" status is subject to be removed in a few weeks and will be replaced by the newly added flags "mfc-stable8", "mfc-stable9" and "mfc-stable10". We would like you to convert the bugs with the status "Needs MFC", that are currently assigned to you, to those new flags and to set the bug to "In Discussion". Please set only those flags to "?", for which a MFC is still required. If a MFC already took place for a stable branch, set the flag to "+". If a MFC will not be done for a stable branch, set the flag to "-". All bugs, which are not converted within the next 14 days (until the 5th of November), will be converted by bugmeister, requesting a MFC for all branches, unknowingly, if that may be correct or not. Thanks for your help Marcus on behalf of bugmeister --q1jWcapaUnvKIiHl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlRF+KEACgkQi68/ErJnpkc8MgCfaH5qG5uscXoLLeIzpA4bSsBR JgoAoMepbQm1lW2vd+l//6+rKVVazq2q =KFKf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --q1jWcapaUnvKIiHl--