From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Dec 23 08:26:20 1994 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id IAA16090 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 23 Dec 1994 08:26:20 -0800 Received: from UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU (root@UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU [129.7.1.11]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with SMTP id QAA16084 for ; Fri, 23 Dec 1994 16:26:17 GMT Received: from Taronga.COM by UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU with UUCP id AA17022 (5.67a/IDA-1.5); Fri, 23 Dec 1994 10:00:42 -0600 Received: by bonkers.taronga.com (smail2.5p) id AA12497; 23 Dec 94 09:39:42 CST (Fri) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bonkers.taronga.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) with SMTP id JAA12493; Fri, 23 Dec 1994 09:39:41 -0600 Message-Id: <199412231539.JAA12493@bonkers.taronga.com> X-Authentication-Warning: bonkers.taronga.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: "Alex R.N. Wetmore" Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Journal (was Re: tar man page) (fwd) In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 23 Dec 94 09:40:48 EST." X-Mailer: exmh version 1.4.1 7/21/94 Date: Fri, 23 Dec 1994 09:39:38 -0600 From: Peter da Silva Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk I hesitate to suggest this, but there are a few other BSD-based systems around other than NetBSD and FreeBSD. Most of the commercial UNIXes are more System V based or running pretty much a Mach kernel, but there's SunOS, Ultrix, and of course BSDI. Should the concentration be on "Free UNIX" or "BSD UNIX"?