From owner-freebsd-arch  Mon May 28  9:29: 0 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from ringworld.nanolink.com (ringworld.nanolink.com [195.24.48.13])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2694D37B42C
	for <arch@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 28 May 2001 09:28:54 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from roam@orbitel.bg)
Received: (qmail 8922 invoked by uid 1000); 28 May 2001 16:27:56 -0000
Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 19:27:56 +0300
From: Peter Pentchev <roam@orbitel.bg>
To: arch@FreeBSD.org
Subject: arch procmail test
Message-ID: <20010528192756.A8556@ringworld.oblivion.bg>
Mail-Followup-To: arch@FreeBSD.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-arch.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-arch>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-arch>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Errrrr...

Please ignore the previous message with this subject..
I'm testing a newly setup procmail, and.. well.. sorry! :)

(Yes, I'm using a random subset of names and addresses from my mail
 folders..  I apologize for any confusion this may have caused..)

G'luck,
Peter

-- 
If there were no counterfactuals, this sentence would not have been paradoxical.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message