Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2000 20:08:23 -0400 (AST) From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: cd /usr/ports;make clean ... Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0002022005400.411-100000@thelab.hub.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Just curious, but would it be that difficult to add code to 'make clean'
that checks for a 'work' directory before actually going through the
process?
Periodically, I clean it all out, and I know I've never built anything
under '/usr/ports/chinese', so why bother cleaning all the dependencies
for something that hasn't needed it:
===> chinese/xemacs
===> Cleaning for zh-arphicttf-2.11
===> Cleaning for xtt-common-1.3.0
===> Cleaning for freetype-1.3
===> Cleaning for gmake-3.78.1
===> Cleaning for XFree86-3.3.6
===> Cleaning for perlftlib-1.2
===> Cleaning for ja-p5-jcode.pl-2.10
===> Cleaning for freetype-1.3
===> Cleaning for gmake-3.78.1
===> Cleaning for XFree86-3.3.6
===> Cleaning for XFree86-3.3.6
===> Cleaning for XFree86-3.3.6
===> Cleaning for zh-xcin-2.5.2b4
===> Cleaning for zh-kcfonts-1.05
===> Cleaning for XFree86-3.3.6
===> Cleaning for zh-libtabe-0.1b8
===> Cleaning for db-2.7.7
===> Cleaning for gmake-3.78.1
===> Cleaning for XFree86-3.3.6
===> Cleaning for db-2.7.7
===> Cleaning for gettext-0.10.35
===> Cleaning for libtool-1.3.3
===> Cleaning for XFree86-3.3.6
===> Cleaning for gmake-3.78.1
===> Cleaning for jpeg-6b
===> Cleaning for png-1.0.5
===> Cleaning for xpm-3.4k
===> Cleaning for XFree86-3.3.6
===> Cleaning for zh-xemacs-20.4
Just a thought, its not something that one tends to do often, but it would
sure speed things up...
Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0002022005400.411-100000>