From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 27 18:14:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 609AF106566C for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:14:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CE6C8FC14 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:14:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PiWMl-0002v2-2b for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 19:14:43 +0100 Received: from p57915ed5.dip.t-dialin.net ([87.145.94.213]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 19:14:43 +0100 Received: from jumper99 by p57915ed5.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 19:14:43 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: "Helmut Schneider" Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:14:32 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 28 Message-ID: References: <20110127174112.GB49557@eggman.experts-exchange.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p57915ed5.dip.t-dialin.net User-Agent: XanaNews/1.19.1.269 X-Ref: news.gmane.org ~XNS:000000B8 Subject: Re: bump of PORTREVISION mandatory? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:14:46 -0000 Jason Helfman wrote: > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 05:30:45PM +0000, Helmut Schneider thus spake: > > Hi, > > > > with the release of Typo3 4.5, 4.4 becomes "old stable", 4.3 becomes > > "deprecated". Therefore a change at pkg_descr is required. That is > > the only change. > > > > Do I need to bump PORTREVISION before I submit the updated port? Is > > that mandatory? > > > > I don't like the idea that someone is asked to update his/her > > installed package only because of a changed pkg_descr. > > > > Thanks, Helmut > > If 4.3 is deprecated, shouldn't it be removed from the tree? (ie. > MOVED/UPDATING) It is still supported (estimated until 06/11) but already called "deprecated". > Why would you need to update the portrevision for a pkg-descr change? > If it isn't changing the behavior of the port, I don't see why that > is necessary, but others may have different ideas on this topic. OK.