From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jan 17 18:43:26 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C894516A422
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 18:43:26 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from mikej@rogers.com)
Received: from smtp106.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp106.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com
	[68.142.225.204])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2AA4643D58
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 18:43:16 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from mikej@rogers.com)
Received: (qmail 29305 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2006 18:43:15 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com;
	h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
	b=RzusAvet50SKi4X489ENcShnoOl4cCi78r1hhofF3hHp6uqL9FHrPm72ZAWr23xNCgtXKJi7BVEcdURzeQ64+MHZtMY2vEvSO0HjzVnAiOwQjDeGo/EgK1XEOdwA6dRMQFLeHMWXrnd7HOCJPfkUmVGiobb1h1NDSi+oQIH66tU=
	; 
Received: from unknown (HELO ?70.30.133.184?) (mikej@rogers.com@70.30.133.184
	with plain)
	by smtp106.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 17 Jan 2006 18:43:15 -0000
Message-ID: <43CD3ACC.2060201@rogers.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 13:43:24 -0500
From: Mike Jakubik <mikej@rogers.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net>
References: <42F871B4.6000703@freebsd.org>
	<200601161324.57292.nike_d@cytexbg.com>
	<43CB8E90.8090902@suutari.iki.fi>
	<20060116175526.GA25023@lizzy.catnook.local>
	<43CBEEF4.1000007@rogers.com> <op.s3hmigpj9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>
	<20060117133604.usxeni3g0s4o8k80@netchild.homeip.net>
	<op.s3iwjsfe9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>
In-Reply-To: <op.s3iwjsfe9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@leidinger.net>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Portsnap is now in the base system
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 18:43:26 -0000

Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 06:36:04 -0600, Alexander Leidinger 
> <Alexander@Leidinger.net> wrote:
>
>> Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net> wrote:
>>
>>>>>> Is there an utility (cvsup-replacement) like this for base 
>>>>>> system  sources ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> See csup: http://mu.org/~mux/csup.html. But it's not ready yet.
>>
>> csup is a rewrite of cvsup in C. So it's not a replacement like 
>> portsnap is,
>> it's just a different implementation of the same procedure.
>>
>>>> Why would one want to replace cvsup? It works great!
>>>
>>> You won't be asking that kind of question if you read there in the 
>>> second  paragraph. ;-)
>>
>> I use both. For *me* the main reason to use portsnap was, that it is 
>> able to
>> fetch updates if the only way to get something from the outside is http
>> (e.g. via a caching proxy). This doesn't matter at home (where I use 
>> both:
>> portsnap to update where I don't need to modify the ports collection, 
>> and
>> cvsup+cvs for ports collection where I make changes). None of those 
>> reasons
>> where outlined in the (removed) paragraph. So I think the question is 
>> valid.
>
> I think, he means why would one want Csup to replace CVSup instead 
> Portsnap replace CVSup. The second paragraph is a valid answer for 
> Csup to replace CVSup, but not Portsnap.

No, thats not what i meant.