From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 07:32:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12E27106566B; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 07:32:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 727888FC12; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 07:32:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by werg1 with SMTP id g1so1769472wer.13 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 00:32:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=E1enrrTkB+CGOVdFFpf3p2CDi2lTzP3s8PnQtvZzJSE=; b=rB2AOavZirpRf5KpttvMD7Kzs7PFasu7VNFlFCfc47e/36Q1cKtGZp/4jy0eMr/0QS 0RB/Z1QSNgFblX2gXHQb/YNKTM+Y/iut+DEEm4hcmCXgzjzPewT7DJPxIXFY7ZJKSVY8 XXVpNoqo1SXhOmR/9D4zvN4ZCW1oXzpbx1aEK3Dctfc4QIkpjpNuxzjmZlGzJmh0N8su lcdJwq56PmiqKiHmzXszsucZZ+G/vS9cjtiskuTcMyvht3FBAmquJpq5Tzsez/NlRved 5kGHHD4YS+8NVoEMMnuKMXSJzjWdmLZoC4Ammxo/XQUVnYTrgiORTXnz/5XC8S8r6BYz CI1A== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.150.225 with SMTP id z75mr4365756wej.77.1339313572394; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 00:32:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.105.232 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 00:32:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <89C1E1C1-FE04-419D-B4C7-893AF8C12843@gmail.com> References: <89C1E1C1-FE04-419D-B4C7-893AF8C12843@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 00:32:52 -0700 Message-ID: From: Jack Vogel To: Nikolay Denev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: jfv@freebsd.org, freebsd-net Subject: Re: 82599EB not supported by ixgbe(4) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 07:32:54 -0000 This was a special 'skew' of the 82599 done for Dell, and as they did not request FreeBSD it did not get called out in our internal development procedures, however you are the second person in a fairly short time who has requested it, and after checking things out there appears to be no reason not to add the ID, so that will be coming shortly. Regards, Jack On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 10:19 PM, Nikolay Denev wrote: > Hello Jack, > > It seems the following controller is not yet supported by ixgbe(4) : > > none4@pci0:3:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x7b118086 chip=0x154d8086 > rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > device = '82599EB 10-Gigabit SFP+ Network Connection' > class = network > subclass = ethernet > none5@pci0:3:0:1: class=0x020000 card=0x7b118086 chip=0x154d8086 > rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > device = '82599EB 10-Gigabit SFP+ Network Connection' > class = network > subclass = ethernet > > Any ideas on how to get that working? Is it just a matter of adding the > PCI ID to the source? (I'll try that now) or are > there any other differences. > > Regards, > Nikolay