From owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Fri Dec 4 13:47:04 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BFC8A41912 for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2015 13:47:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 578611D24 for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2015 13:47:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id tB4Dl4qW028111 for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2015 13:47:04 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 178997] [vfs] [patch] Heavy disk I/O may hang system Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 13:47:02 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: pr@tns.cz X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 13:47:04 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178997 pr@tns.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pr@tns.cz --- Comment #16 from pr@tns.cz --- (In reply to rainer from comment #15) We seem to experience this problem independently too (tested on 10.2-RELEASE and 10.1-RELEASE-p21). In the testing environment the system behaves as described by rainer. In production, the symptoms seem to be the same (but the traffic is not generated artificially). Is there any progress or plans about this issue? Klaus, please, did you solve the problem? Thanks in advance, Pavel -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.