From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 18 13:50:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D52F16A41F for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 13:50:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1703643D49 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 13:50:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jAIDoY5K016950 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 13:50:34 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id jAIDoYYh016949; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 13:50:34 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 13:50:34 GMT Message-Id: <200511181350.jAIDoYYh016949@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Sam Lawrance Cc: Subject: Re: ports/89041: radiusclient-0.5.2 port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Sam Lawrance List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 13:50:35 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/89041; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Sam Lawrance To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, maurice@sphinx.clari.net.au Cc: Subject: Re: ports/89041: radiusclient-0.5.2 port Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 00:45:35 +1100 Is the port actually broken? There are two other ports that depend on it, so it still has a purpose.