From owner-freebsd-current Mon Jun 17 20:28:28 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.92.13.169]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 353C237B40B; Mon, 17 Jun 2002 20:28:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.3/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g5I3QmP8020768; Mon, 17 Jun 2002 20:26:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.4/8.12.3/Submit) id g5I3QlHk020767; Mon, 17 Jun 2002 20:26:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 20:26:47 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Oliver Braun , ijliao@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org, sobomax@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rsync 5.x breakage Message-ID: <20020617202647.D20621@dragon.nuxi.com> Reply-To: current@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Mail-Followup-To: David O'Brien , Oliver Braun , ijliao@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org, sobomax@FreeBSD.org References: <20020616040000.A16402@xor.obsecurity.org> <20020616123029.GA12998@informatik.unibw-muenchen.de> <20020616114359.C24973@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20020616114359.C24973@xor.obsecurity.org>; from kris@obsecurity.org on Sun, Jun 16, 2002 at 11:43:59AM -0700 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Jun 16, 2002 at 11:43:59AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > ==> ${REINPLACE_CMD} has different semantics on -current and -stable > > > > Maintainer only using -stable won't be able to get that error and fix it > > _before_ submitting. > > Yeah, I really don't like this. At the very minimum there needs to be > an easy way port maintainers can test with all variants of the > REINPLACE_CMD implementation to make sure it works in all cases. The > differences in regexp syntax is going to be another major cause of > tears. Personally I fail to see what is so wrong with making Perl a BUILD_DEPENDS. I did this for my own ports. IMO just about every system out there is going to have perl installed for one reason or another. So I don't see this as an unreasonable dependancy. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message