Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 09:05:47 -0400 From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> To: Kevin Oberman <kob6558@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, freebsd-current Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Updating the tuning man page Message-ID: <CAF6rxg=5j4g7YqtBSZAWqypiG09c1DtW4HNmduO=%2Bz4ZvnX6jg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAN6yY1sq0RFWtkYeuto0ghsr58cikv7v5x5t7jMcHTS%2Bm_pcWw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAF6rxgkFYr5FQojhRJQB910odeOhtSidUfvCXHzhLhG5nh-vpA@mail.gmail.com> <CAN6yY1sq0RFWtkYeuto0ghsr58cikv7v5x5t7jMcHTS%2Bm_pcWw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Kevin Oberman <kob6558@gmail.com> wrote: > Should tuning include discussion of tuning for power management? Even > server operators are becoming aware of the need for power management > and the only really good information on it is mav's excellent wiki > page. From queries about the subject, most people really don't > understand the concepts and do the wrong thing. Frankly, FreeBSD does > the wrong thing by default, as mav pointed out. Sure - the page could include anything relevant. Please just edit it. -- Eitan Adler
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxg=5j4g7YqtBSZAWqypiG09c1DtW4HNmduO=%2Bz4ZvnX6jg>