From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 21 13:40:16 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B03A16A4CE for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 13:40:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from srv1.cosmo-project.de (srv1.cosmo-project.de [213.83.6.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 964F243F85 for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 13:40:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely5.cicely.de (cicely5.cicely.de [IPv6:3ffe:400:8d0:301:200:92ff:fe9b:20e7]) (authenticated bits=0) hALLe8vq069233 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=OK); Fri, 21 Nov 2003 22:40:11 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely12.cicely.de (cicely12.cicely.de [IPv6:3ffe:400:8d0:301::12]) by cicely5.cicely.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hALLe5ER024400 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 21 Nov 2003 22:40:06 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely12.cicely.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cicely12.cicely.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hALLe52u011087; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 22:40:05 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: (from ticso@localhost) by cicely12.cicely.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id hALLe4Pb011086; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 22:40:04 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 22:40:04 +0100 From: Bernd Walter To: quel@quelrod.net Message-ID: <20031121214003.GG74178@cicely12.cicely.de> References: <20031121200702.GD74178@cicely12.cicely.de> <20031121211627.GF74178@cicely12.cicely.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD cicely12.cicely.de 5.1-CURRENT alpha User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: ticso@cicely.de Subject: Re: usb 2.0 dell inspirion 8500 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: ticso@cicely.de List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 21:40:16 -0000 On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 03:37:10PM -0600, quel@quelrod.net wrote: > Could you point me to information as to why it is not in GENERIC? Because it is not requireds for device to work, but on the other hand in some cases doesn't work with ehci, such as hubs and interrupt transfers. Adding ehci is more speed with less functionality. > On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Bernd Walter wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 03:10:10PM -0600, quel@quelrod.net wrote: > > > Should device ehci be a default in GENERIC, then? > > > > It is intentionally not in GENERIC. > > > > > On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Bernd Walter wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 10:47:35AM -0600, quel@quelrod.net wrote: > > > > > I recently got a usb 2.0 hard drive to which I painfully wait for 1MB/s > > > > > transfers. According to dmesg fbsd is only doing 1.0: > > > > > usb0: on uhci0 > > > > > usb0: USB revision 1.0 > > > > > usb1: on uhci1 > > > > > usb1: USB revision 1.0 > > > > > usb2: on uhci2 > > > > > usb2: USB revision 1.0 > > > > > > > > > > (Yes i double checked my laptop does indeed have usb 2.0) > > > > > > > > > > I saw that ehci had usb 2.0 support comitted. Is this coming for uhci? I > > > > > suppose it's too late to get this into 5.2 -RELEASE. > > > > > > > > uhci is strictly an usb1.x controller. > > > > Build a kernel with ehci support if you have a high speed capable > > > > controller. -- B.Walter BWCT http://www.bwct.de ticso@bwct.de info@bwct.de