From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 23 08:22:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A19EB1065674; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 08:22:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de (mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de [217.11.53.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D77C8FC12; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 08:22:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from outgoing.leidinger.net (p5796DADA.dip.t-dialin.net [87.150.218.218]) by mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 661678443F6; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 09:21:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from webmail.leidinger.net (webmail.Leidinger.net [IPv6:fd73:10c7:2053:1::3:102]) by outgoing.leidinger.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF12C5875; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 09:21:56 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=leidinger.net; s=outgoing-alex; t=1329985316; bh=jIjp6pK6lvmV2fA1k5TxO2SiVBlUKc/yAUn8p59jEHI=; h=Date:Message-ID:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=dY8Rdvsm2Mf3/GkKq6XcGl4b6ew/q+AxSvPkVyCd+DovF8T0tj5muuWnw5cZsCteC Kx3XJgjn+u/geyT5BLMTPqG2CvtxQ53J6AiLu1pW55HsGbpdfu7k9uE8cZWp4+MQSZ myCsC/acF35CCM+7+SiqvQN/AsvxPNw92tV0FtzGvbs6M3bc18HjFdnlDjSNdAqE+h dZaa7Oq3EMHpBqOPJ0eG8kGMcMT5YfO+WIaf5iY08ZSlfFjDSX+Su6TiJjl/ibGUQP 8rcFelNzOjCjEGK/UfOFpO7G2CNhCD+j1k0C2fPe4dCOTBxavKw9fQKe4Man0mfo3H r4jUrrOMRXlRA== Received: (from www@localhost) by webmail.leidinger.net (8.14.5/8.14.4/Submit) id q1N8Lt6M065842; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 09:21:55 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) X-Authentication-Warning: webmail.leidinger.net: www set sender to Alexander@Leidinger.net using -f Received: from 85.94.224.20 ([85.94.224.20]) by webmail.leidinger.net (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 09:21:55 +0100 Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 09:21:55 +0100 Message-ID: <20120223092155.Horde.rNNRQ5jmRSRPRfcjkkZhALY@webmail.leidinger.net> From: Alexander Leidinger To: Scott Long References: <20120221155656.Horde.kkqxT5jmRSRPQ7C4wSPK1kA@webmail.leidinger.net> <1DA65887-49B6-446D-AC31-67B149A6C736@samsco.org> <20120222092219.Horde.AvbvLpjmRSRPRKW7YuZBYu8@webmail.leidinger.net> <7274C496-567B-413D-AE7D-D4AB762CEE7E@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <7274C496-567B-413D-AE7D-D4AB762CEE7E@samsco.org> User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H4 (5.0.18) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline X-EBL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-EBL-MailScanner-ID: 661678443F6.A2A32 X-EBL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-EBL-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, spamhaus-ZEN, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=0.867, required 6, autolearn=disabled, AWL -1.88, DKIM_SIGNED 0.10, DKIM_VALID -0.10, DKIM_VALID_AU -0.10, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET 1.25, RCVD_IN_SORBS 1.00, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB 0.61, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD -0.01) X-EBL-MailScanner-From: alexander@leidinger.net X-EBL-MailScanner-Watermark: 1330590121.96897@OFSQ4FFQKiz2B7LSbEWACw X-EBL-Spam-Status: No Cc: marius@freebsd.org, gallatin@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org, np@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NICs not in GENERIC X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 08:22:14 -0000 Quoting Scott Long (from Wed, 22 Feb 2012 08:42:39 -0700): > On Feb 22, 2012, at 1:22 AM, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > >> Quoting Scott Long (from Tue, 21 Feb 2012 >> 17:45:04 -0700): >> >>> On Feb 21, 2012, at 7:56 AM, Alexander Leidinger wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> is there a specific reason that the following NICs are not (or >>>> shall not be) in GENERIC (at least on i386)? >>>> - if_cas: is compiled as a module, Sun hardware, non-x86 only? >>>> - if_gem: is compiled as a module, Apple/Sun, non-x86 only? >>>> - if_hme: is compiled as a module, Sun hardware, non-x86 only? >>> >>> If these aren't for i386 hardware, then why would they need to be >>> in the i386 GENERIC profile? >> >> I didn't told they aren't for i386 (Sun and Apple produce(d) x86 >> hardware). If they would have been non-x86 drivers (I assume you've >> seen the answer from Marius), the bug would have been that they are >> build as modules on x86. >> > > Let it go. Can you please rephrase this for a non-native english speaker please? I don't understand what is the subject of your message. Do you ask to not include those 3 into GENERIC, or do you ask to forget you asked initially? Bye, Alexander. -- Every time I look at you I am more convinced of Darwin's theory. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137