From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Apr 19 09:47:03 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 2E41A16A4CE; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 09:47:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from seed.net.tw (sn15.seed.net.tw [139.175.54.15])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C381543D46; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 09:47:02 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from leafy@leafy.idv.tw)
Received: from [61.59.121.140] (port=50787 helo=chihiro.leafy.idv.tw)
	by seed.net.tw with esmtp (Seednet 4.23:1)
	id 1BFbv7-0000ss-Ni; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 00:46:57 +0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by chihiro.leafy.idv.tw (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 097905E6; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 00:46:57 +0800 (CST)
Received: from chihiro.leafy.idv.tw ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (chihiro.leafy.idv.tw [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 56305-03; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 00:46:56 +0800 (CST)
Received: by chihiro.leafy.idv.tw (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 68B855C3; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 00:46:56 +0800 (CST)
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 00:46:56 +0800
From: leafy <leafy@leafy.idv.tw>
To: Jonathan Fosburgh <syjef@mdanderson.org>
Message-ID: <20040419164656.GA56629@chihiro.leafy.idv.tw>
Mail-Followup-To: Jonathan Fosburgh <syjef@mdanderson.org>,
	Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org,
	Lukas Ertl <le@FreeBSD.org>
References: <200404191110.20057.jonathan@fosburgh.org>
	<20040419181423.H650@korben> <4083FD45.6050604@FreeBSD.org>
	<200404191136.53506.syjef@mdanderson.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=big5
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200404191136.53506.syjef@mdanderson.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at leafy.idv.tw
cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
cc: Lukas Ertl <le@FreeBSD.org>
cc: Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: SMBFS problems in this morning's -CURRENT
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 16:47:03 -0000

On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 11:36:35AM -0500, Jonathan Fosburgh wrote:
> I had to do the same thing this time, but I assumed (perhaps incorrectly) that 
> it had something to do with trying to use the previous, incorrect version of 
> mount_smbfs.
> 
> - -- 
> Jonathan Fosburgh
The new binary requires this, the old one did not. The commit message 
says that mount(2) will auto-load the smbfs kernel module, but I am 
afraid it's not the case.

Jiawei
-- 
"Without the userland, the kernel is useless."
               --inspired by The Tao of Programming