From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 28 06:12:05 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA6DF16A4BF for ; Thu, 28 Aug 2003 06:12:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from radix.sorted.org (radix.sorted.org [194.70.217.146]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E3C343FFB for ; Thu, 28 Aug 2003 06:12:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pete@sorted.org) Received: by radix.sorted.org (Postfix, from userid 501) id F02722BA62; Thu, 28 Aug 2003 14:12:02 +0100 (BST) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 14:12:02 +0100 From: Pete Bentley To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030828131202.GC32941@sorted.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE on SunFire V100 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 13:12:05 -0000 On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 01:03:53PM +0000, Rob MacGregor wrote: > Well, I've just proven that any attempt to ping causes an IOMMU fault :-( Really? Not on my X1 it doesn't... You *did* set the MAC address to something non-zero before trying that, right? > I'll be using NetBSD on this box by the looks of things. If I get another > box and enough spare time I'll raise a bug report. For what it's worth, I also had trouble with NetBSD on the X1 so decided to persevere with FreeBSD. YMMV. Pete.