From owner-freebsd-current  Fri Feb  9 19:36:53 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id TAA10384
          for current-outgoing; Fri, 9 Feb 1996 19:36:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id TAA10378
          Fri, 9 Feb 1996 19:36:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rover.village.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with SMTP id UAA24921; Fri, 9 Feb 1996 20:36:42 -0700
Message-Id: <199602100336.UAA24921@rover.village.org>
To: dima@FreeBSD.org (Dima Ruban)
Subject: Re: Kerberos @ freebsd.org? 
Cc: ache@astral.msk.su, current@FreeBSD.org
In-reply-to: Your message of Fri, 09 Feb 1996 19:10:02 PST
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 1996 20:36:42 -0700
From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

: Is eBones compatible with KerberosIV? I mean, I have kerberos on 
: some of my computers, and I've heard encryption (or something else) isn't
: compatible beetween kerberos and ebones. So, basically the question is:
: will I be able to use eBones/kerberos encryption if I go from
: kerberos machine to eBones server?

I'm not sure what the exact interoperability status is.  To date I've
just usered our version to access machines that are running our
version.  I've heard conflicting things about eBones vs KerberosIV.

Warner