From owner-freebsd-current Wed Apr 18 5:17:18 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53F3237B423 for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 05:17:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bde@zeta.org.au) Received: from bde.zeta.org.au (bde.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.102]) by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA08487; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 22:16:58 +1000 Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 22:16:02 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-Sender: bde@besplex.bde.org To: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai Cc: Matt Dillon , Doug Barton , "Justin T. Gibbs" , "'current@freebsd.org'" , Dan Langille Subject: Re: FW: Filesystem gets a huge performance boost In-Reply-To: <20010418103332.B45919@daemon.ninth-circle.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote: > -On [20010417 20:47], Matt Dillon (dillon@earth.backplane.com) wrote: > > Testing it 'on' in stable on production systems and observing the > > relative change in performance is a worthy experiment. Testing it > > 'on' in current is just an experiment. > > I have been running vfs.vmiodirenable=1 on two STABLE boxes for the last > week or so. Still no problems. Been doing massive cvsups and all > that. > This is not in combination with softupdates. That's next on the agenda. So, how much slower was it? ;-) Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message